Legal Opinion
Wong v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1975No. L.A. 30422PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar (board) that petitioner be disbarred. Petitioner was admitted to practice in January 1960 and has no prior record of discipline.
As has been pointed out by this court on innumerable occasions (see, e.g., In re Silverton, 14 Cal.3d 517, 523 [121 Cal.Rptr. 596, 535 P.2d 724]; In re Greenstein, 14 Cal.3d 387, 389 [121 Cal.Rptr. 255, 534 P.2d 1335]), the burden is on petitioner to show that the board’s recommendation is erroneous or unlawful. Petitioner, however, has failed to meet this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Patty v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Best v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Siegel v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arthurs v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- McComb v. COMM. ON JUD. PERFORMANCECalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Matter of GoldmanMontana Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re MostmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Martin B. v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.