Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Michos

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1948No. Docket No. 71, Calendar No. 44,205PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiffs and defendant own adjacent lots. The location of the boundary line between the two lots is disputed by the parties, leaving-ownership of a 3-foot strip in controversy. Defendant began construction of a building on his lot for which a trench was dug and footings poured extending, as plaintiffs claim, 3 feet over plaintiffs’ side of the dividing- line.

Plaintiffs filed a bill in chancery claiming- ownership of the disputed 3-foot strip, alleging themselves to be in possession and that defendant was threatening to block their use thereof, and praying that they be decreed to be the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Warner v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Campbell v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Featherston v. Pontiac TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. HamrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Golaher v. HuntingMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ruda v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API