Legal Opinion

Ross v. Adams

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1859PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Ob applicatioB for money paid into court.

1Opinion of the Court

The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court, delivered by

YEEDEimuEGH, J.

The Erie Eailroad Company, in 1856, took, under the provisions of their charter, the west half of lots ETo. 1, 2, 3, and 4, of block 159, on Mangin’s map of Jersey City. The jury assessed their value at $3061, which has been brought into this court. The charter vests the entire interest in the land in the company. This money represents the whole fee simple.

The applicant claims to have the whole of this money paid over to him. This is resisted by Miss Traphagen, Mr. and Mrs. Adams, and in behalf of the minor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mills v. CatlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  2. The Brig Short Staple & Cargo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  3. Peck v. WaltonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga County, Ohio, v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  2. Notaro v. NotaroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Cuyahoga County, Ohio, v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API