Legal Opinion

Notaro v. Notaro

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 2, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

38 N.J. Super. 311 (1955)

118 A.2d 880

MARIE NOTARO, PLAINTIFF,

v.

FRANK NOTARO, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided December 2, 1955.

Mr. Harry Adler, attorney for plaintiff (Mr. David L. Horuvitz, of counsel).

Mr. William Gallner and Mr. Robert G. Howell, attorneys for defendant.

HANEMAN, J.S.C.

The plaintiff herein seeks a judgment establishing that she has an undivided one-half interest as a tenant in common with the defendant in the property described in the complaint.

The facts in connection herewith are as follows: The plaintiff was born on November 19, 1922. She…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Condit v. BigalowNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1903
  2. Mayor of Paterson v. East Jersey Water Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
  3. Massie v. Asbestos Brake Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  4. Reilly v. GriffithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  5. Hampton v. Hampton Holding Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chance v. McCannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  2. Bancredit, Inc. v. BetheaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. In Re the Score Board, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API