Legal Opinion

Christopherson v. Deere & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 12, 1991No. 90-2231PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Curtis M. and Monica R. Chris-topherson appeal from the final judgment entered on the jury verdict in their products liability action. The jury awarded compensatory damages to plaintiffs, denied their claim for punitive damages and, applying the Iowa law of comparative fault, found Curtis Christopherson responsible for twenty percent of his injuries. Federal subject matter jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) (1988). Appellate jurisdiction is based upon 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988). We affirm.

Only a brief statement of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Rowe International, Inc. v. J-B Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Schwennen v. AbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. Hughes v. Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Vicki CROSS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emanuel CLEAVER II, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  2. Clair W. BURKE, Appellee, v. DEERE & COMPANY, A/K/A John Deere Company, a Delaware Corporation, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,373 Nathaniel Ancho v. Pentek CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Starks v. Rent-a-CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Sherman v. KasotakisDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API