Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Balogh v. Balogh

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 2014No. SCWC-11-00010741Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Amended Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

POLLACK, J.

I. Background

In the period leading up to the signing of the “agreements” at issue in this case, Sandra Balogh’s (Sandra) and Donald Balogh’s (Ray) marriage was deteriorating. “There was constant shouting and screaming. It was an ugly situation with no communication between the parties.”1 Id. Ray was under heavy stress as he was unable to control his exhibitionist behavior even though he knew it was wrong.2 Ray was also out of work at the time of the signing of the “agreements” in October 2008, having just retired a few months earlier.

After…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Bremer v. WeeksHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Montalvo v. LapezHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API