Legal Opinion
Naylor v. Harkins
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 16, 1953PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
27 N.J. Super. 594 (1953)
99 A.2d 849
ARTHUR F. NAYLOR, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THOMAS J. HARKINS, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided October 16, 1953.
Mr. James M. Davis. Jr., for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Clifford D. O'Brien, of the Illinois Bar, admitted pro hac vice for defendants (Mr. Horace G. Brown, of counsel; Mr. Horace G. Brown and Miss Ruth Weyand, of the Illinois Bar, on the brief).
GOLDMANN, J.S.C.
The present case is conspicuous for its voluminous record, lengthy and involved briefs, and the large number of pleadings and papers comprising the file. To…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brennan v. United Hatters of North America, Local No. 17Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- Louis Schlesinger Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Simpson v. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
- Naylor v. HarkinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- State v. Grand Lodge of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Parks v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Morganroth & Morganroth v. Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Morganroth & Morganroth v. Norris, Mclaughlin & Marcus, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Parks v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Naylor v. HarkinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.