Legal Opinion
Naylor v. Harkins
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 3, 1954PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
32 N.J. Super. 559 (1954)
109 A.2d 19
ARTHUR F. NAYLOR, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-DEFENDANTS,
v.
THOMAS J. HARKINS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 14, 1954.
Decided November 3, 1954.
Before Judges JAYNE, STANTON and HALL.
Mr. James M. Davis, Jr., argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants (Mr. James A. Matthews, of counsel).
Mr. Clifford D. O'Brien of the Illinois Bar argued the cause for the defendants-respondents (Messrs. Horace G. Brown and Howard G. Kulp, Jr., attorneys; Miss Ruth Weyand of the Illinois Bar, of counsel).
The opinion of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Naylor v. HarkinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- State v. Grand Lodge of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
- Dragwa v. Federal Labor Union No. 23070New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
- Naylor v. HarkinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Barnhart v. United Automobile, Etc., Local 669New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Parks v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Morganroth & Morganroth v. Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Morganroth & Morganroth v. Norris, Mclaughlin & Marcus, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Parks v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Bd. of Education, Asbury Park v. HoekNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.