Legal Opinion
Hooper v. Zajac
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided January 25, 1982No. 81-182PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
Hooper, a resident of Faulkner county, filed this suit in the Faulkner circuit court, asserting one cause of action against Zajac and a different cause of action against Edwards and Chapman. All three defendants moved to quash the summons on the ground that they reside in Pulaski county and must be sued there. Hooper filed a reply alleging that his cause of action is asserted not in contract but in tort and particularly under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-611 (Repl. 1979), which is a venue statute. The trial judge, without hearing testimony, sustained the motion and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Harvester Company v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Hooten v. State ex rel. Cross CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Evans Laboratories, Inc. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Meyers v. MeyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Quality Motors, Inc. v. HaysSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Henderson Specialties, Inc. v. Boone County Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Premium Aircraft Parts, LLC v. Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Beatty v. PonderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- FirstSouth, P.A. v. YatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Beatty v. PonderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982