Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beatty v. Ponder

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 13, 1982No. 82-148Published

1DissentJohn I. Purtle, Justice

I think the majority misinterprets Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-611 (Repl. 1979). The plain language of the statute appears to me to allow an action for damage to personal property, caused by the negligence of another, to be brought in the county of the plaintiff’s residence. The statute reads as follows:

27-611. Actions for damages to or conversion of personal property. — Any action for damages to personal property by wrongful or negligent act, or for the conversion of personal property, may be brought either in the county where the accident occurred which caused the damage, or in the county where…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. International Harvester Company v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  2. Evans Laboratories, Inc. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Hooper v. ZajacSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API