Legal Opinion

Groth v. Weinstock

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 6, 1992No. 92-80PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

610 So.2d 477 (1992)

Suzanne GROTH, Appellant,

v.

Ronda C. WEINSTOCK, Ph.D., Appellee.

No. 92-80.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

November 6, 1992.

Rehearing Denied January 5, 1993.

Robert S. Sigman of Robert S. Sigman, P.A., Maitland, for appellant.

Francis H. Sheppard of Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, A Professional Ass'n, Orlando, for appellee.

HAMMOND, K., Associate Judge.

Suzanne Groth appeals from the final judgment dismissing her action against Dr. Ronda Weinstock, a licensed clinical psychologist. The complaint was dismissed because Suzanne failed to allege compliance with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. PW Ventures, Inc. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Towerhouse Condominium, Inc. v. MillmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. NME Properties, Inc. v. McCulloughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. NME Hospitals, Inc. v. AzzaritiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weinstock v. GrothSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Weinstock v. GrothDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API