Legal Opinion
Weinstock v. Groth
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 1, 1995No. 95-1173PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
659 So.2d 713 (1995)
Ronda C. WEINSTOCK, Ph.D., Petitioner,
v.
Suzanne GROTH, Respondent.
No. 95-1173.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
September 1, 1995.
Francis H. Sheppard and Sharon K. Duncan of Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.C., Orlando, for petitioner.
Harry K. Anderson and J. Scott Murphy of Anderson, Murphy & O'Hara, P.A., Orlando, for respondent.
COBB, Judge.
The petitioner, Dr. Ronda C. Weinstock, seeks certiorari review of a trial court order allowing various discovery requests. Her principal argument is based upon the psychotherapist/patient privilege.
In February, 1991,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. SavageSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Weinstock v. GrothSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Palm Beach County School Bd. v. MorrisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Arzola v. ReigosaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Partner-Brown v. BornsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Wilder v. WilderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Pauker v. OlsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002