Corsar v. J. D. Spreckels & Bros.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeal and Cross-Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. See 125 Fed. 786.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
The ship Musselcrag, owned by C. W. Corsar, sailed from Antwerp on the 19th day of July, 1899, laden with a cargo of cement, and bound for San Francisco, which place was reached 315 days thereafter, whereas her voyage under ordinary conditions should not have exceeded 140 days. A part of the cargo was jettisoned on the way, and a part of- it was badly damaged, resulting in this libel by its consignee, J. D. Spreckels & Bros. Company, by which the libelant seeks to recover $1,233 for the cement totally lost, and $11,500 for that damaged; the averments of the libel being…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The SilviaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The CaledoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- The Edwin I. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- The DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- The GermanicSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Nichimen Company, Inc. v. M. v. Farland, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and A/s Vigra, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees v. Seaboard Shipping Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Rainey v. New York & P. S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
- Oxford Paper Co. v. the NidarholmSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hamilton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.