Legal Opinion
Rainey v. New York & P. S. S. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 3, 1914No. 2011PublishedCited by 37 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington; C. H. Hanford, Judge. Suit in admiralty by Mary F. Rainey, as administratrix of David I,. Rainey,_ deceased, against the New York & Pacific Steamship Company, Limited, and W. R. Grace & Co., a corporation. Decree for respondents, and libelant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
Subsequent to the filing in the court below of the libel in this case, the respective parties thereto entered into this:
*450“Stipulation as to Facts and Dismissal.
“It is hereby stipulated by and between the above-named libelant, 'W. R. Grace & Co., one of the above-named respondents, and the New York & Pacific Steamship Company, Limited, one of the above-named respondents, heretofore appearing specially and now appearing specially for the purposes of this stipulation, as follows:
“First. That the respondent New York & Pacific Steamship Company, Limited, a corporation of Great…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Geofroy v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- In Re RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- The Edwin I. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- The CaledoniaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- George W. Dixon, Libelant-Appellee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Rolph Navigation & Coal Co. v. KohilasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Ozanic v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.