Legal Opinion

Fulenwider v. Fulenwider

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 14, 1939No. 12957PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

The first two headnotes need no elaboration, except as to the contentions of the husband indicated in the subdivisions of headnote 2.(a) The first contention is that the husband was relieved from complying with the $50 condition for the wife’s release of alimony claims, because the parties made a subsequent novation by which this provision of the original written separation contract was eliminated. This, he contends, arose from the wife’s acceptance of *862new terms, stated in two letters written by the husband’s attorneys to the wife’s attorney on the two days following the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Broderick v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Rieves v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Coley v. ColeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Delaware Insurance v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Purser v. Rountree & McAfeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kniepkamp v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Green v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Kirchman v. KirchmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Touchton v. Echols CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  5. Head v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API