Legal Opinion

Touchton v. Echols County

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1954No. 18743PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

Only the third headnote requires any elaboration. Mandamus is a proper remedy for official inaction. Code § 64-101. It does not lie to control the action of an officer vested with a discretion, in the absence of a gross abuse of such discretion. City of Atlanta v. Wright, 119 Ga. 207 (45 S. E. 994); Wood v. Board of Education of Washington County, 137 Ga. 808 (74 S. E. 540); Richmond County v. Steed, 150 Ga. 229, 232 (103 S. E. 253); McGinty v. Gormley, 181 Ga. 644 (183 S. E. 804); Ward v. Drennon, 201 Ga. 605 (40 S. E. 2d 549).

The plaintiffs contend that there is no statutory…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Winston v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Richmond County v. SteedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  3. City of Atlanta v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Marks v. Richmond CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. McGinty v. GormleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  2. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  3. Lindsey v. GuhlSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  4. Rolleston v. Glynn County Board of Tax AssessorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Wheeler v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API