Legal Opinion
State v. Jensen
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 2005No. S-04-314, S-04-315PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
NATURE OF CASE
The Antelope County Court concluded that neither Earleen Jensen nor Justin Jensen was a resident of the village of Royal, Nebraska, for purposes of an election held there on November 5, 2002. The county court found them guilty of illegal voting, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 32-1528 (Reissue 2004). Earleen and Justin appeal from orders of the Antelope County District Court which affirmed the judgments of the county court.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
In an appeal of a criminal case from the county court, the district court acts as an intermediate court of appeal, and as such, its review is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Pickering v. WinchOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Adams v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Cooper's Adm'r v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RoyerNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. LESOING-DITTOENebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Acklie v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022
- Houghton v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2021