Legal Opinion

Hawaii National Bank v. Okino

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1969No. 4904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LEVINSON, J.

Petitioner, Hawaii National Bank, seeks a writ of mandamus commanding Respondent, Judge Tom Okino of the First Circuit Court, to follow and implement the decision of this court in Akamine & Sons, Ltd. v. American Security Bank, 50 Haw. 304, 440 P.2d 262 (1968), rehearing denied 50 Haw. 368 (1968). American Security Bank has intervened in opposition to the petition for mandamus and alternative writ of mandamus.

In the Akamine case Hawaii National Bank intervened in an action by the mortgagor, Akamine & Sons, Ltd., to enjoin a sale by American Security under a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Akamine & Sons, Ltd. v. American Security BankHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Marshall Construction Co. v. BigelowHawaii Supreme Court · 1926
  3. In re SherwoodHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Harris v. GoodaleHawaii Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kamaole Resort Twenty-One v. Ficke Hawaiian Investments, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  2. AKAMINE & SONS v. Hawaii Nat. Bank, HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Rattancraft of California Harper, Robinson & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  4. Agricolas de Mexico, S. de R. L. de C. V. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. AKAMINE & SONS v. Hawaii Nat. Bank, HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API