Legal Opinion
Iverson v. Grant
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided April 2, 1996No. CIV. 95-5024PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BATTEY, Chief Judge.
NATURE AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 10, 1995, plaintiffs Keith and Shirlee Iverson filed an amended complaint charging defendants with various counts of copyright infringement and unfair trade practice. Plaintiffs’ counsel was- granted leave to withdraw on August 24, 1995, and plaintiffs have continued to proceed pro se with this.litigation.
On May 18,1995, defendants Arco Publishing, Inc. (Arco) and Prentice-Hall Canada, Inc. (Prentice-Hall Canada) filed separate motions for dismissal pursuant to Fed.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cy Wakeman, Inc. v. Nicole Price Consulting, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2018