Legal Opinion

Vanderscoff v. Vanderscoff

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2010No. 20100092PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] David Vanderscoff appeals from a district court order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s order awarding Elaine Vanderscoff $88,113 in attorney’s fees and costs. We conclude the district court abused its discretion in denying David Vanderscoffs motion for reconsideration. We affirm the court’s order awarding Elaine Vanderscoff attorney’s fees and costs for her motion for a money judgment, and we reverse the court’s order awarding Elaine Vanderscoff attorney’s fees and costs for David Van-derscoffs 2007 motion to modify spousal support and the subsequent…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Riverwood Commercial Park, L.L.C. v. Standard Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Ungar v. North Dakota State UniversityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Wetch v. WetchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Martinson v. MartinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Whitmire v. WhitmireNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hammeren v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Wheeler v. Southport Seven Planned Unit DevelopmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Brigham Oil & Gas, L.P. v. Lario Oil & Gas Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API