Legal Opinion

SYRETT v. TROPIC & EAST FORK IRR. CO. Et Al.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1939No. 6062PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

The principal question to be determined by this court on this appeal is: Does a stockholder in a mutual irrigation company who wishes to change the point at which he receives his water from the company’s irrigation canal, and use the water to irrigate different lands than those which have theretofore been irrigated by such water, have to make application to the state engineer under the provisions of Section 100-8-3, R. S. U. 1933, as amended by Chapter 130, Laws of Utah 1937?

The facts are: Appellant Syrett is a stockholder in respondent irrigation company, having purchased 620…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arnold v. Huntington Canal & Reservoir Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. East Jordan Irrigation Co. v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Uintah BasinUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Strawberry Water Users Ass'n v. Bureau of ReclamationUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Southam v. South Despain Ditch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Syrett v. Tropic East Fork Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API