State v. Condry
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.
Defendant, Billy Lee Condry, was indicted for and convicted after a jury trial of perjury based on testimony he gave under oath on two separate occasions. The testimony was to the effect that he had witnessed his wife affix her signature to a will which was offered and received in probate in the Superior Court of Yuma County, Arizona. He appeals. Judgment of conviction affirmed.
The defendant raises but a single issue. He asserts that the trial court committed *500reversible error in permitting the prosecuting attorney to comment on his failure to call a particular…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sullivan v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Arthur H. Samish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- State v. YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. HattenArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Hackin v. GaynesArizona Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. DawsonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. JerdeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- State V, CriswellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. CromCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. DawsonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.