Hassey v. Ruggles
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL fro-m a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facte are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This is an action originally commenced by the plaintiff as the administrator of the estate of F. A. Hassey, deceased, against A. B. Ruggles and a number of other persons comprising the membership of the San Francisco Stock and Exchange Board, an unincorporated association, to recover the sum of four thousand dollars.
The facts out of which this alleged indebtedness arose are substantially undisputed. The San Francisco Stock and Exchange Board was organized in the year 1862 by the voluntary association of its members for the purpose of mutually facilitating the business in which they were…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clute v. LovelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Shannon v. CheneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jardine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Aviles v. Subaru of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Sandra Garybo v. Leonardo BrosDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Wayfer v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2025