Legal Opinion

Ross Lawn Equipment, Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1995No. Claim No. 76586PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and application denied. Memorandum: The court erred in granting claimant’s application for an additional allowance pursuant to EDPL 701, following entry and payment of the judgment (see, Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v Great Bend Aggregates, 181 AD2d 998). Claimant’s reliance on Scuderi v State of New York (184 AD2d 1073) and Hakes v State of New York (184 AD2d 1035, affd 81 NY2d 392) is misplaced because timeliness was not at issue in those cases. (Appeal from Judgment of Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J.—Counsel Fees.) Present—Green, J. P.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hakes v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Scuderi v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Hakes v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Crushed Stone Co. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. General Crushed Stone Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API