Legal Opinion

Curtin v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 10, 2012No. 09-109TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION1

MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, filed September 8, 2011. The Court finds that under 26 U.S.C. § 7422(e), it lost subject-matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ refund claim when plaintiffs and third-party defendant filed suit in the United States Tax Court challenging the Internal Revenue Service’s (the “IRS”) notice of deficiency. Because the Court already dismissed plaintiffs’ replacement check claim, the only other claim in the amended complaint, it must now dismiss plaintiffs’ entire suit. Thus, the Court grants…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Naftel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  2. Gene A. Folden, Coastal Communications Associates, and Judith A. Longshore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Dolores J. Russell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. John F. Finley, of the Estate of Mildred B. Whitlock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Curtin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Cheesecake Factory Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Curtin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API