Legal Opinion
Conness v. Satram
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 10, 2004No. A104888PublishedCited by 16 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMONS, J.—
Pursuant to the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (DVPA) (Fam. Code, 1 § 6200 et seq.), a court may issue a protective order to restrain any person for the purpose of preventing a recurrence of domestic violence and ensuring a period of separation of the persons involved. (§§ 6220, 6300.) California law regulates the issuance of mutual restraining orders under the DVPA by subjecting them to additional procedural requirements. (§ 6305.) In this case, Usha Satram (appellant) appeals a restraining order issued against her on behalf of Raymond Conness (respondent). Among her…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Lee v. Wells Fargo Bank, NACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. CastilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Sommi v. AyerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nakamura v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Melissa G. v. Raymond M., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- J.J. v. M.F.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Herriott v. Herriott, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Banda v. Wash CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.