Legal Opinion
Charles Yeksigian v. Ralph Nappi, Howard Nicholas, and City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 16, 1990No. 89-1601PublishedCited by 141 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Charles Yeksigian appeals the dismissal of his federal civil rights claim and pendent state claims against defendants Ralph Nap-pi, Howard Nicholas, and the City of Chicago. For the following reasons, we reverse the judgment of dismissal and remand the case to the district court.
I
BACKGROUND
A. Facts
On appeal from the dismissal of a complaint under Rule 12(b)(6), we must accept as true all the plaintiff’s well-pleaded factual allegations and the inferences reasonably drawn from them. Zinser v. Rose, 868 F.2d 938, 939 (7th Cir.1989); Gillman v. Burlington N. R.R., 878 F.2d…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Gibson v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Jackie Vance v. Howard Peters, Iii, Director, Jane E. Higgins, Warden, and James Roy, Correctional OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Carlton Gunn v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Bogi Miller v. Lionel A. Smith, and Kevin BrowerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Guzman v. SheahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.