Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. Bartlett

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BLOSSER, J.

Emma Bartlett and others instituted this action in the Court of Common Pleas against Charles T. O’Neil and others to contest the validity of a paper writing purporting to be the last will and testament of Mattie B. Kauf, deceased. The verdict of the jury and the judgment which followed were in favor of the plaintiffs and the defendants thereupon prosecuted error to this court.

During the oral presentation of the case counsel for the plaintiffs in error urged in the closing argument that there is prejudicial error in the general charge of the court to the jury wherein it is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Nocar v. FilmoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WestfallOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Arrow Aluminum Castings Co. v. Thor Mold & MacHine Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API