Legal Opinion
United States v. Rudolph Jackson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 19, 2012No. 11-3688PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Rudolph Jackson conditionally pled guilty to the charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), reserving the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress the firearm discovered in the vehicle he was driving. On appeal, he challenges the legality of the traffic stop and inventory search of the vehicle that led to his arrest. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I
During a roll call meeting on the afternoon of August 17, 2010, supervisors at the Akron, Ohio, Police…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. John Jay Hill and Malcolm Scott HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. John Joseph Coffee, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Troy HockenberryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Garrett LottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Brandon AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Craig SnoddyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.