Legal Opinion
Girden v. Alubowicz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 7, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
This was a suit to quiet title with incidental relief. A counterclaim also sought to have the title quieted and made incidental claims. The subject matter of the suit was a piece of ill-defined wild land on the shore of the Lake of Isles in North Stonington. Judgment was for the defendant on the complaint and counterclaim and the plaintiff appealed.
The following facts were not disputed: On January-28, 1930, the plaintiff bought a tract of about ninety acres in the Lake of Isles ’ development from the Air Proof Rubber Company. The disputed lot, No. 19, was included. The deed was recorded the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boston & Albany Railroad v. ReardonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Lengyel v. PeregrinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Flaxman v. Capitol City Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Whitaker v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- Monterosso v. KentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dacey v. Connecticut Bar Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Armac Industries, Ltd. v. CitytrustSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Schroder v. BattistoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Eliason v. Production Credit Association of AitkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960