Legal Opinion
In re J.R.R.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided September 18, 1985No. C-4338PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Per curiam
J.R.R. and two other youths were arrested early one morning riding stolen bicycles. J.R.R. was adjudicated as having engaged in delinquent conduct on the basis of the testimony of T.S., age fifteen, an accomplice. The court of appeals, 689 S.W.2d 516, found that the testimony of T.S. was not corroborated as required by the Texas Family Code § 54.03(e), and since this resulted in insufficient evidence to support the judgment of the trial court, remanded it to that court for another trial.
In Walker v. State, 615 S.W.2d 728 (Tex.Crim.App.1981), this problem was addressed in a case involving an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In the Matter of B.P.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- G.M.P., Matter OfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- C.F. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- In re H.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. C.J.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.