Legal Opinion

United States v. Land

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 1, 2000No. 99-30187PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

To resolve the instant case we .must determine whether a landowner’s damages in a condemnation suit can be adjusted to reflect a prior regulatory taking by the Government where the landowner’s efforts to be compensated for that regulatory taking via a separate inverse condemnation suit have already failed. We answer that question in the negative, holding that a landowner who has lost an inverse condemnation claim may not use the compensation phase of subsequent condemnation proceedings to make an “end run” around res judicata and the Tucker Act’s statute of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. 320.0 Acres of Land, More or Less in the County of Monroe, State of Florida,and Salvatore R. CicconeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Castro v. Collecto, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. 480.00 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Michael Sammons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  4. City of Boulder v. Fowler Irrevocable Trust 1992-1Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. National Food & Beverage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API