Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard William Peterson

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 10, 2012No. 10-15527, 10-15536PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

This criminal case involves sophisticated financial structuring through the interplay of related corporate subsidiaries in the context of the insurance business. While such financial structuring is not inherently improper, here the two Appellants, William Allen Broughton (“Broughton”) and Richard William Peterson (“Peterson”), were convicted of conducting a modern-day financial shell game in which they falsified financial statements, exchanged paper ownership over non-extant fraudulent assets, and collected insurance premiums and monthly payments from unwitting innocents. 1…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Floyd Brown, James Woodrow Mullis, Paul Wendell Calhoun, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. EllisorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Vanston Venner WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Maynard Kenneth GodwinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Isaac FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Wenxia ManCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API