Legal Opinion

Shaler v. Reynolds

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1960No. Docket 30, 31, Calendar 48,316, 48,317PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In 2 separate actions plaintiff seeks to hold responsible for his injury the divorced parents (and a stepparent) of the 16-year-old driver and owner of an automobile which was involved in an accident with plaintiff.

On separate motions, heard at the same time, the trial judge took testimony under Court Rule No 18, § 3 (1945), and dismissed both cases as to the adult defendants.

The cause of action in the first case continues as to the minor.

The undisputed facts in these matters are recited thus by appellant’s brief:

“Robert Jeffery Reynolds was a little over 16 years of age at the time of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parks v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Robinson v. EbertWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Foster v. RinzMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Rogers v. WagstaffUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Stevens v. Van DeusenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Semmens v. Floyd Rice Ford, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Dortman v. LesterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API