Legal Opinion

Muenstermann by Muenstermann v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 20, 1992No. Civ. N-89-427PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NORTHROP, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs, Jonathan Muenstermann, a minor, and his mother Margaret Muenster-mann, both as mother and next friend, bring this suit against the Government under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), 2671-2680. Gerard E. Mitchell and Christopher Mitchell represented the Plaintiffs. Counsel for the government were Dale Kelberman and Beth P. Gesner. The case was well presented by all the attorneys for both parties.

Jonathan Muenstermann was born on March 16, 1986. At birth, no one knew that Jonathan suffered a…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Jacques v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kent Village Associates Joint Venture v. SmithCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Calva-Cerqueira v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  3. Lawson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
  4. Deasy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Bankert Ex Rel. Bankert v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API