Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. Dixon

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1967No. 4071, 4072PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Judge.

In this case, which involved two traffic violations, the District of Columbia appeals from a finding of “not guilty,” entered after the prosecutor had asked for a continuance and been refused, and had then announced his intention to enter nolle prosequis. The two cases had earlier been continued three times at the request of defendant, three times by mutual consent, and once at the request of the prosecution. On March 31, 1966, the prosecutor asked for a further continuance on the ground that one of two policemen had become ill and had gone home with a temperature of 101…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Clawans v. RivesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. Hunter v. WadeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  4. United States v. FosterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. District of Columbia v. WeamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller A. Dixon v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Bokowsky v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  3. District of Columbia v. BenefieldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. United States v. OliverDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Miller A. Dixon v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API