Legal Opinion

Finn v. Valley City Street & Cable Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Kent. (Burch, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This is an action on the case for negligence. At the conclusion of the plaintiff's testimony the court directed a verdict for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

The defendant operates a cable street railway on North Ionia street in the city of Grand Rapids. Plaintiff was a passenger, and, while alighting from the car, was by the movement of the car thrown down upon the ground and injured. At the time the train consisted of a grip-*75car and one coach. The terminus of the line is a few rods beyond Legrand street, and plaintiff’s destination was Legrand street. The conductor occupied the front…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Colorado Springs & Interurban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  2. Gardner v. Detroit Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Tuttle v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Keeley v. City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Reese v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API