Reese v. Detroit United Railway
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Case by Henrietta I. Reese against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff recovered a judgment for injuries received by her while a passenger on one of the cars of defendant company. The case is brought here by writ of error.
The car on which plaintiff became a passenger had three entrances, one at the rear, one in the middle of the right-hand side, and the third at the front. The seats ran at right angles to the sides of the car so that passengers when seated faced the motorman. The aisle ran along the right-hand side from the rear to the front door. Mrs. Reese and her friends occupied a seat about opposite the middle door, with Mrs. Reese sitting at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burke v. Bay City Traction & Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Beattie v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Finn v. Valley City Street & Cable Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Kirchner v. Detroit City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Ensley v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. LipsczinskaMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Bolton v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Virginia Public Service Co. v. SilverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934