Legal Opinion

White v. Jaegerman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 30, 1970No. 69 Civ. 1276PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

COOPER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs move to disqualify defendant’s counsel1 and defendant cross-moves for production, inspection and copying of documents pursuant to Rule 34, F.R.Civ.P.2 Plaintiffs’ motion denied. Defendant’s motion granted.

We concur with the statement under similar facts in Jones v. Kennedy, 73 App.D.C. 292, 121 F.2d 40 (1941):

Our attention has not been called to any statute or rule that prevents attorneys employed by the [Securities and Exchange] Commission from representing government officers sued in their individual capacity for acts growing out of or connected…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Zients v. LaMorteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Penn Central Commercial Paper LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. Belcher v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  3. Weiner v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1977
  4. Willard J. Lamorte v. Hon. Walter R. Mansfield, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. In re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API