Legal Opinion

Lovelace v. Gross

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur W. Lonschein, J.

This is a complaint which asks the court to declare Social Services Law § 131-c invalid to the extent that it applies the "grandparent deeming” rule to grants of relief under the Home Relief program.

This rule applies to minors with children of their own. It provides that if the minor parents reside in the home of their parents (their children’s grandparents), the income of the *606grandparents is deemed to be available to the grandchildren, and must be taken into account in calculating the grandchildren’s eligibility for Home Relief assistance and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Tucker v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Marcus Associates, Inc. v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. In re the Estate of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Capozzi v. New York State Department of Social ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bullock v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Lovelace v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API