Legal Opinion

Lovelace v. Gross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 26, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action for a judgment declaring Social Services Law § 131-c (2) unconstitutional, the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated March 29, 1989, which granted the motion of the defendants to dismiss the complaint and denied their cross motion, inter alia, for class action certification.

Ordered that the order and judgment is modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto declaring that Social Services Law § 131-c (2) is not violative of either the New York State nor Federal Constitutions; as so modified, the order and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Bernstein v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Board of Education v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lovelace v. GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Oakwood Cemetery v. Village/Town of Mount KiscoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Oakwood Cemetery v. Village/Town of Mount KiscoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API