Legal Opinion

Petworth Holdings, LLC v. Bowser

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 3, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-0003Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PETWORTH HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 18-3 (JEB) MURIEL BOWSER, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Early last year, Plaintiffs Petworth Holdings, LLC and John Formant filed suit in this Court asserting that a local statute regulating certain gas stations in the District of Columbia violates the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Citing an intervening change in the law governing Fifth Amendment challenges, Plaintiffs now move to amend their Complaint to add a new claim under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

an…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Knick v. Township of ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API