Legal Opinion

Complaints of the Taxing Districts v. Middlesex County Equalization Table

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided June 10, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Waesche, Pbesident.

The statute, Pamph. L. 1934, ch. 191, § 3, provides that the State Board of Tax Appeals may review a county equalization table on the complaint of any taxing district, or on its own motion, R. S. 54:2-37; N. J. S. A. 54:2-37. This section of the statute also authorizes the Board to make all orders necessary to carry out such a review. The Division of Tax Appeals is the successor to the State Board of Tax Appeals. Pamph. L. 1944, ch. 112; N. J. S. A. 52:27B-52.

By a later statute the Division of Tax Appeals also is given authority to review a county equalization table. Pamph.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haythorn v. Van Keuren & SonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  2. State v. SimpkinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  3. New Jersey Zinc Co. v. Sussex County Board of Equalization of TaxesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  4. Town of West Hoboken v. County Board of Commissioners of Appeal in Cases of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Passaic v. Passaic County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. In Re Township of MillburnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. Town of Secaucus v. Hudson County Board of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1998
  4. Borough of Wood-ridge v. Bergen County Board of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API