Legal Opinion

New Jersey Zinc Co. v. Sussex County Board of Equalization of Taxes

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 9, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

*187Tbe opinion of the court was delivered, by

Eort, J.

The first objection is that the act creating the Sussex county board' of equalization of taxes (Pamph. L. 1900, p. 134) is unconstitutional, because it provides for the appointment of the commissioners by the judge of the Court of Common Pleas. This contention cannot be sustained. Ross v. Freeholders of Essex, 40 Vroom 291.

The increased assessment in this case must be set aside for a number of reasons.

First. Because no proper notice of the proposed action by the board was given to the assessor of Hardyston township, as required by statute.

The…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oates v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  2. City of Biloxi v. Biloxi Real Estate Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Complaints of the Taxing Districts v. Middlesex County Equalization TableNew Jersey Tax Court · 1947
  4. Borough of Totowa v. Passaic County Bd. of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API