Legal Opinion

McClary v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 2011No. 07-CF-1154PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Senior Judge:

At trial, the court limited appellant’s cross-examination of the victim, Sean Grady, by not allowing inquiry into -Grady’s potential self-interest bias in favor of the government stemming from his previous juvenile record, his probationary status, as well as his recent arrest just before he testified at trial. The complete denial of cross-examination to explore potential bias is tantamount to a denial of a defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights. See Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 679, 106 S.Ct. 1431, 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986). However, the trial court has discretion to…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Sherer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. In re J.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API