Legal Opinion

Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. New York Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1936No. Civ. No. 10843PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action for conversion. The facts material to this litigation are that in 1925 Pacific National Building Corporation constructed a twelve-story bank and office building at 855 South Hill Street in the city of Los Angeles. All of the stock of Pacific National Building Corporation was owned by a parent holding company known -as Pacific National Company. Prior to the completion of the building, the ground floor and basement thereof were leased to Pacific National Bank, predecessor in interest of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. MacDermot v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Boland v. GosserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Alderman v. BaggettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hessell v. HealeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API