Legal Opinion
Dike v. Dike
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1994No. S-92-361PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.
Robert V. Dike appeals a district court order increasing his child support obligation for his son from $100 to $165 per month and requiring him to provide medical insurance for his son if it is available through Dike’s employer. The court’s order was entered pursuant to Nebraska’s Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (RURESA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 42-762 to 42-7,104 (Reissue 1988 & Cum. Supp. 1992).
We affirm the order of the district court for Lancaster County.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Fixing the amount of child support is equitable in nature, and, thus, such determinations under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoch v. ProkopNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Phelps v. PhelpsNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Joyce v. JoyceNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Chisholm v. ChisholmNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Interest of DWNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- First National Bank v. Union InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Estate of SouleNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Hunter v. MorseNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Stansbury v. HEP, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.