Legal Opinion

In re the Guardianship of Hitchcock

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Reserved Question erom Circuit Judge, Fourth Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

ROBERTSON, C.J. (Perry, J., dissenting.)

The facts here involved are, in substance, as follows: On December 2nd 1901, the will of the late Edward N. Hitchcock, deceased, was duly admitted to probate by the circuit judge of the fourth judicial circuit; that in said will the testator named his wife as guardian of the person and property of their daughter, Hildreth Castle Hitchcock, to whom he had bequeathed a portion of the proceeds of a certain life insurance policy; that on December 5th, Clare Fassett Hitchcock, widow of the testator, now Mrs. E. H. Moses, was, upon her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blyew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Blackburn v. CraufurdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
  3. Conyers v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Kundolf v. . ThalheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  5. The RichmondU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. CaloneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API