Legal Opinion

The Richmond

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Billings, D. J.

A motion has been made that I should decline to sit in this cause because I have been of counsel. The doctrine ol recusation of judges is of continental origin. According to the lavs of Great Britain it has been unknown since before Blackstono’s time. According to the law which prevails upon the continent, and as declared in the Code of France, a judge is recusable if he has given counsel, pleaded, or written of the controversy, has previously acted as judge or arbitrator, or defrayed the expenses of the suit, deposed as a witness, etc. But at the common law as it prevailed in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Lyon v. State BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1828
  3. Blackburn v. CraufurdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
  4. Bank of North America v. FitzsimonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1810
  5. Cook v. BerthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beauregard v. DaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. United States v. VasilickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  3. Epstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  4. Duncan v. Atlantic Coast Line R.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1915
  5. Notley v. BrownHawaii Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API