Legal Opinion
Pike v. Tuttle
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 1971No. Civ. 1329PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GARGANO, J.—Appellant
appeals from a judgment, after court trial, awarding respondent $4,000 on a promissory note, together with accrued interest and attorney’s fees. The facts are undisputed.
In 1958 Ray Pike loaned $54,562 to Russell M. Edson and Anna E. Edson for the purchase of a nursing home. The loan was evidenced by a promissory note calling for $250 monthly payments on principal, pay able on the tenth day of each month, and monthly interest payments on the unpaid balance at the rate of 8 percent per annum, and was secured by a first deed of trust against the nursing home. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Murdock v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. KelseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Imhoff v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jessup Farms v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Shepherd v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Lomanto v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Lennar Northeast Partners v. BuiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- BMP Property Development v. MelvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.